Revival Of Wisdom

https://revivalofwisdom.com/?sca_ref=8569789.uqVLIPJtYJ

This is invaluable reading for the initiated and those seeking enlightenment.

Sound kills cancer

 https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeLAEYuR/

Ultrasound

 https://t.me/ajcro77/2549

Don't fall for the fictitious China virus. There is no evidence - period!

 Page 1 of 13

Monograph One. The Coronahysteria Series: ‘SARS-CoV-2’, the ‘novel Coronavirus’. A monograph by an independent research consultant on the accuracy of the tests.

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE ‘NOVEL CORONAVIRUS’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’?

Author: Kevin P. Corbett MSc PhD Independent Research Consultant KPC Research & Consultancy Ltd London, England, Great Britain. kpcresearch@btinternet.com

Page 2 of 13

CONTENTS

KEY ARGUMENTS.................................................................................................................................. 3

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?.................................................................................................................. 4

No Gold Standard, No Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates ....................................................................... 4

Britain Is Using Flawed Tests .............................................................................................................. 4

The Pathology of Lockdown ‘Science’ ................................................................................................. 7 British Scientific Credibility Compromised ........................................................................................... 8 Lack of Scientific Transparency and Public Accountability .................................................................. 9 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 9 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................... 10

How to cite this monograph: Corbett K (2020) Monograph One. Where is the Evidence For The Existence of The ‘novel Coronavirus’, SARS-CoV-2? The Coronahysteria Series:‘SARS-CoV-2’, the ‘novel Coronavirus’. London, KPC Research and Consultancy Limited. April 2020. ISBN 978-1-5272-6214-0.

Page 3 of 13

KEY ARGUMENTS

Test regulators must publish evidence for this ‘novel Coronavirus’ (‘SARS-CoV-2’) showing viral purification and visualization in order to underpin the gold standard for the respective RT-PCR and antibody tests.

If the ‘novel Coronavirus’ is proven to exist, regulators must then publish evidence showing how this ‘novel Coronavirus’ fulfils Koch’s postulates before it can be assumed that it causes the ‘new’ disease recently termed ‘Covid-19’.

Page 4 of 13

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?

No Gold Standard, No Fulfilment of Koch’s Postulates

Viral purification and visualisation prior to test manufacture is the scientific approach for validating how accurately tests perform - ‘gold standard’ (White and Fenner,1986 p9). This must be followed by proof that any proven viral agent fulfils Koch’s postulates for causation of this ‘new’ disease called ‘Covid-19’ which is currently lacking (e.g. Zhu et al 2020).

A forthcoming scientific paper on current RT-PCR/antibody tests for the ‘novel Coronavirus’ (‘SARS-Cov-2’) by leading scientists in the U.S. state of Georgia states:

“There is no gold standard for COVID-19 since this specific virus has never been properly purified and visualized. Thus, the accuracies of the tests are unknown. The development of these test kits is contrary to the FDA’s guidance document.”

Reliable analytical data is critical for the correct determination of the real presence or absence

of COVID-19 infection.” (Ogenstad et al 2020 pp3-4)

The above extract – confirmed by the Georgia State U.S. authors - reveals that the way these tests perform when testing patients/staff has never been properly evaluated in relation to the gold standard of “purified virus”. This means that the accuracy of these tests is currently unknown and impossible to judge until more work is completed.

Britain Is Using Flawed Tests

Investigative journalists at London’s Daily Telegraph (Donnelly and Gardner 2020) report that the British test regulator - Public Health England (PHE) - is using flawed ‘novel Coronavirus’ tests (for ‘SARS-CoV-2’) with no real capacity to roll out national screening and testing (Open Democracy 2020) on thousands of UK National Health Service (NHS) patients and workers. PHE is also reportedly giving ‘discordant’ (+/-) results, running in-house testing (aka ‘home brew’), and creating differences between the PHE ‘in-house’ tests and commercially available tests (Donnelly and Gardner 2020).

Page 5 of 13

The Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Test – used for initial hospital screening for the disease Covid-19 (assumed to be caused by this supposed ‘novel Coronavirus’) is thought to detect what is believed to be bits of ‘RNA’ from this ‘novel Coronavirus’. Similarly, the antibody test for this ‘novel Coronavirus’ is assumed to detect viral ‘antibodies’ but in Britain it was proven to be unsuitable (Smythe et al, 2020).

Data sheets (e.g. Roche, 2020) rushed out from the test manufacturers and fast-tracked for clinical use by the US Federal Drug Administration under Emergency Use Authorisation have dropped the requisite caveats that such tests MUST be confirmed by comparison with purified infectious virus - and not just from bits of RNA, the so-called ‘RNAaemia’ of Huang et al (2020 p499) assumed to come from a ‘novel Coronavirus’ based only on molecular/genetic similarity.

All of the above arguments (and more) were first advanced about the ‘isolation’ of ‘HIV’ and its role in AIDS by Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al (2012). However, these sorts of arguments were vehemently and continuously rejected by ‘mainstream’ scientists. As Ogenstad et al are ‘mainstream’ scientists; it is now interesting, one could say highly worrying, to see how these so-called ‘rejected arguments’ are now so adamantly advanced by Ogenstad et al for these RT-PCR/antibody tests. It is highly worrying because the implications and ramifications stemming from what Ogenstad et al are now admitting is that the science underpinning the Lockdown and the continued erosion of our liberties is not just questionable (as is all ‘normal science’ (Kuhn (2012)) but is wrong at worst or fatally misguided at best.

The gold standard for any ‘novel Coronavirus’ test is the best independent way to measure the test’s accuracy at truly detecting those patients with and without the virus, the positive predictive value of the tests (Griner et al 1981). Logically, as the Georgia State U.S. scientists imply, the gold standard must not be bits of RNA (‘RNAaemia’) but “purified virus” confirmed by “purification” and “visualisation” using electron microscopy (White and Fenner,1986 p9). Even then, after what Ogenstad et al (2020) term “the correct determination of the real presence or absence of COVID-19 infection” [SARS-CoV-2, ‘novel Coronavirus’] these conjectured ‘viral’ particles must be rigorously proven to cause the disease through strict criteria called Koch’s postulates (University of Maryland 2020), which have never been fulfilled for the ‘novel Coronavirus’ (Zhu et al 2020, Crowe 2020a).

This may help to explain why the PHE is now reporting ‘discordant results’ (non-binary) where some people test alternatively ‘positive’ and then ‘negative’, with or without symptoms, according to

Page 6 of 13

investigative journalists at London’s Daily Telegraph (Donnelly and Garner 2020). These PHE reports match other studies which show how the test is as far from binary (Li et al 2020) as a quantum, the cut-off is in reality totally arbitrary (Young et al 2020), discordant results occur continuously with the same patients (Cao et al 2020, Li et al 2020), and the quantity of RNA totally fails to correlate with illness severity (Young et al 2020).

British test guidance says the precautionary actions governing quality control of the RT-PCR should be expedited to get a definitive result (NHS England and NHS Improvement 2020 p8). This further helps to explain reports showing that people have been advised to return to work too early (false negatives), and vice-versa, people are similarly misadvised - to stay off work unnecessarily (false positives) (Donnelly and Gardner 2020).

Furthermore, the number testing RT-PCR positive (with or without antibodies) is reportedly inaccurate (Donnelly and Gardner 2020) and likely conflates false + true positives: false positives are those testing positive that never had the virus, and false negatives vice-versa. As the Georgia State US scientists openly admit: “the accuracies of the tests are unknown”. Coupled with these problems is the subjective way in which different definitions are made of how a positive test is arrived at (Bustin and Nolan 2017, Crowe 2020b). For example, in the ‘HIV/AIDS’ era this gave rise to a whole set of different generations of test methodologies engendering false and indeterminate results subsequently terrorising patients due to the uncertainty experienced (Corbett 2001, Corbett 2009). The evidence underpinning the accuracy of these ‘novel Coronavirus’ tests have been exhaustively summarised by David Crowe, an independent Canadian researcher, on the London website ‘Lockdown Sceptics’ (Crowe 2020c).

The Georgia State US scientists (Ogenstad et al 2020) show the downside of the global rush to judgement and the dangerous bypassing of the expected precautionary principle with regard to test development. It points to the regulatory veneer of scientific certainty over testing versus the actuality of scientific uncertainty. The fast-tracking of tests together with the fear induced actions of the World Health Organisation and the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry have produced a confluence of interests. This is the background for the panic-driven collusion of the official health authorities - the U.S. Federal Drug Administration and their respective British counterparts (PHE/the British National Institute for Health And Care Excellence (NICE)). Together, under emergency instructions, these forces are rolling out these tests (accuracy ‘unknown’) onto a public who unquestionably believes them to be ‘sound’ and to be ‘binary’. This is an appalling scientific disaster of enormous proportions, implications and ramifications.

Page 7 of 13

Ogenstad et al (2020) are clearly admitting that no purified infectious ‘novel Coronavirus’ (‘SARS-Cov-2’) has ever been adequately demonstrated as coming from patients (e.g. see Huang et al 2020). The implication is that the ‘novel Coronavirus’ RNA/antibodies whose veracity are assumed by PHE/FDA may not actually prove to be ‘viral’ but could represent other phenomena. For example some scientists like Andrew Kaufman (Kaufman, 2020) suggest these may be ‘exosomes’, whilst others point to numerous confounding process artefacts (Schierwater et al 2009), or due to the laboratory ‘quality processes’ which appear remarkably open to errors and misinterpretation (Bustin and Nolan 2017). Until the proper research is suitably undertaken (and reproduced) regulators cannot scientifically claim that the tests are accurate.

The Pathology of Lockdown ‘Science’

The ‘science’ underpinning this Lockdown is becoming more and more like the science underpinning Irving Langmuir’s concept of ‘pathological science’ (Langmuir 1953) with its ‘claims of great accuracy’, now refuted (e.g. Imperial College London’s ‘model epidemic’). For example, the fantastic over-reach theories, contrary to human knowledge/experience, of this ‘novel Coronavirus’ that certain contagion occurs through the normal quotidian of ‘touch’; ‘receiving holy communion’; ‘breathing’; ‘sitting on a park bench’; ‘attending funerals’;‘CPR’;‘non-invasive ventilation’; and ‘being present with hospitalised loved ones on their death beds’ etc. This fauxdemic’s ‘high ratio of supporters to critics’ was initially rising but is now acknowledged as falling, as we see an emergent Lockdown ennui amongst politicians, scientists and the general population. All of these italicised characteristics of Langmuir’s ‘pathological science’ are now arguably fulfilled in the case of this ‘novel Coronavirus’ and ‘Covid-19’. This fauxdemic, by bizarrely turning the normal into the abnormal, is arguably looking like another instance of pathological science, such as cold fusion theory. Many scientists have tried to rein in the zealotry of Imperial College London’s epidemiology, but with little apparent success. For example, the work of Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson of Oxford University did not impact greatly in the media or with government even though they showed good evidence that this ‘pandemic’ is a “..late seasonal effect in the Northern Hemisphere on the back of a mild ILI season.” (‘ILI’=influenza-like illness)(Heneghan and Jefferson 2020).

Page 8 of 13

Furthermore, daily snitch reports by the media show how the mystical spell cast by the pathological science can wear off, as all sections of society can wake up to the reality of what has been so zealously perpetrated in the name of ‘epidemiological science’. This is the creation in the Western world of an inhuman dystopia of prospective mandatory screening, flawed testing and fast-tracked vaccination (akin to Communist China), from which all our elected ‘Free World’ politicians have failed to protect us.

The characteristics of this emerging dystopic order form the thematic of a further monograph in this Coronahysteria series.

British Scientific Credibility Compromised

What is not publicly admitted by PHE and is implicit in the above cited reports is PHE’s failure to create testing capacity. This may be due to the rapid NHS public health changes which followed the Lansley NHS reorganisation (Health and Social Care Act 2012). It locally disaggregated services like PHE and exacerbated the existing NHS contract culture (Ham et al 2015). Those highly controversial reforms are now fatally impacting on test-kit purchasing and in-house test evaluation which is required on a UK-wide, and not a local [‘home-brew’] scale and must impact similarly across both the NHS and commercial providers.

The marshalling of testing capacity in the UK is not happening quickly enough as the necessary infrastructure has changed from the 1980s when ‘HIV’ tests were the official panic. The infrastructure developed from the 1980s onward by Phillip Mortimer, and the now extinct Public Health Laboratory Service, created a truly innovative HIV testing strategy using in-house ELISA algorithms, thus dumping the more expensive/less accurate US ones (Corbett 1998). Such British innovation was arguably largely due to Mortimer’s creative scientific leadership of the PHLS (Corbett 1998). At the time of Lansley’s NHS reorganisation, some very erudite and evidence-based warnings went almost entirely unheeded over the subsequent negative effects of the ensuing contract-culture (e.g. Pollock et al 2012).

Page 9 of 13

Lack of Scientific Transparency and Public Accountability

What is very clear now is how our PHE experts seem much less transparent about these failures and the limitations of existing science, unlike their US colleagues (in the leaked report), who are basically calling for the scientific evidence for the existence of this ‘novel Coronavirus’. A lot depends on this as the lockdown continues and civil liberties are severely curtailed (Corbett and Crowe 2020). Other independent researchers have already called for this sort of evidence (Crowe 2020) but their pleas have gone unheeded, or have been dismissed by officialdom just as was the work of Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.

PHE and other national test regulators like the FDA must now urgently publish reproducible analyses on the ‘proper’ purification and visualisation of this ‘novel Coronavirus’ to underpin the proper gold standard for any associated testing.

CONCLUSION

Our respective test regulators, who in Britain are incapable of supplying the testing technology required for this government-imposed Lockdown, are practising what some call incomplete and erroneous science (OffGuardian 2020). They must be made fully accountable, and be required to address in the terms described in the opening of this monograph, this question:

Where is your evidence for the existence of the ‘novel Coronavirus’, ‘SARS-CoV-2’?

Page 10 of 13

REFERENCES

Bustin S Nolan T (2017) Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: RT‐qPCR as a paradigm for the lack of reproducibility in molecular research. European Journal of Clinical Investigation: August 10 https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12801

Cao S, Wu A, Li J et al.(2020) Recurrent recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a COVID-19 patient, April 15, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-23197/v1

Corbett K (2018) The Regulation of British HIV Testing, 1985-2003. London, KPC Research and Consultancy Ltd.www.kevinpcorbett.com

Corbett, K (2001) Contesting AIDS/HIV: the lay reception of biomedical knowledge. Unpublished PhD thesis, London South Bank University. https://lispac.lsbu.ac.uk/record=b1015575~S1

Corbett, K (2009) “You’ve got it, you may have it, you haven’t got it”: multiplicity, heterogeneity, and the unintended consequences of HIV-related tests. Science, Technology and Human Values, 34 (1), pp. 102-125. ISSN 0162-2439. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0162243907310376

Corbett K, Crowe D (2020) Problems with current UK government lockdown policy. Journal of Advanced Nursing interactive. https://journalofadvancednursing.blogspot.com/2020/04/problems-with-current-uk-government.html

Crowe D (2020a) Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory. https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

Crowe D (2020b) The Infectious Myth - Simplifying RT-PC.R. The Infectious Myth, April 21. https://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/RT-PCR_Test_Issues.php

Crowe D (2020c) The Incredible and Scary Truth about COVID-19 Tests. London, Lockdown Sceptics April 26 https://lockdownsceptics.org/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-19-tests-2/

Donnelly L, Gardner B (2020) Revealed: NHS staff given flawed coronavirus tests

Leaked memo exposes farce as Covid-19 results are less reliable than first thought because of 'degraded' performance. April 21. London. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/04/21/public-health-england-admits-coronavirus-tests-used-send-nhs/

Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI (1981) Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Annals of Internal Medicine 94:559-563.

Ham C, Baird C, Gregory S, Jabbal J, Alderwick H (2015) The NHS under the coalition government. London, King’s Fund. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/default/files/field/field_publication_file/the-nhs-under-the-coalition-government-part-one-nhs-reform.pdf

Health and Social Care Act (2012) Health and Social Care Act. London, Her Majesty’s Government http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted

Page 11 of 13

Heneghan C, Jefferson T (2020) COVID-19 deaths compared with “Swine Flu”. Oxford University and The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine develops, promotes and disseminates better evidence for healthcare. April 9, https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-deaths-compared-with-swine-flu/

Huang C et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan,

China. Lancet. 2020 Jan 24. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-

6736(20)30183-5/fulltext

Kaufman A (2020) Dr. Andrew Kaufman: Is COVID-19 an Exosome? https://hipegalaxy.com/covid19/dr-andrew-kaufman-is-covid-19-an-exosome/

Kuhn, Thomas S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 50th anniversary. Ian Hacking (intro.) (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Langmuir I (1953) Pathological Science. Colloquium at The Knolls Research Laboratory Niskayuna, New York City, New York, December 18, 1953. Transcribed and edited by R. N. Hall. https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~ken/Langmuir/langmuir.htm

Li, Y, Yao, L, Li, J, et al. (2020) Stability issues of RT‐PCR testing of SARS‐CoV‐2 for hospitalized patients clinically diagnosed with COVID‐19. Journal of Medical Virology, 1– 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25786

NHS England and NHS Improvement (2020) Guidance and standard operating procedure COVID-19 virus testing in NHS laboratories. London, NHS England and NHS Improvement. https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/publication/guidance-and-standard-operating-procedure-covid-19-virus-testing-in-nhs-laboratories/

OffGuardian (2020) 12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic.https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic/

Ogenstad S, Peace K, Liu L (2020) Accurate COVID-19 Testing in Clinical Trials. Unpublished paper submitted to Journal of Bioharmaceutical Statistics.

Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E et al.(2012) HIV – A virus like no other. Posted at the Perth Group website July 12th. www.theperthgroup.com/HIV/TPGVirusLikeNoOther.pdf

Pollock A, Macfarlane A, Godden S (2012) Dismantling the signposts to public health? NHS data under the Health and Social Care Act 2012. https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2364

Roche (2020) Covid-19 Factsheet. Cobas®-SARS-CoV-2. Fact Sheet. Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Pleasanton, California. https://www.fda.gov/media/136047/download

Schierwater B, Metzler D, Kr€uger K, Streit B (2009) The effects of nested primer binding sites on the reproducibility of PCR: mathematical modeling and computer simulation studies. Journal of Computational Biology 3, 235–51.

Smyth C, Kennedy D, Kenber B ( 2020). "Britain has millions of coronavirus antibody tests, but they don't work" London April 6. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/britain-has-millions-of-coronavirus-antibody-tests-but-they-don-t-work-j7kb55g89

Page 12 of 13

University of Maryland (2020) Koch’s Postulates to Identify the Causative Agent of an Infectious Disease. http://science.umd.edu/classroom/bsci424/BSCI223WebSiteFiles/KochsPostulates.htm

White DO, Fenner FJ. (1986) Medical Virology. San Diego, Academic Press.

Young BE et al. Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARSCoV-

2 in Singapore. JAMA. 2020 March 3. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762688

Zhu N et al. (2020) A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl Journal of Medicine. January 14. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

Page 13 of 13

DESIGNED AND PUBLISHED IN APRIL 2020

KPC RESEARCH AND CONSULTANCY LIMITED

An independent research and management consultancy owned and directed by Kevin P Corbett.

ABOUTH THE AUTHOR

Kevin P Corbett completed both undergraduate and postgraduate training in Art at the University of Reading (1979) and The Slade School of Fine Art, University College London (1981). Kevin qualified as a Registered Nurse in 1986 becoming part of the commissioned staff for Broderip Ward at The Middlesex Hospital, London, Britain’s first purpose-built HIV/AIDS unit, opened by Princess Diana in 1987. Postgraduate nursing research followed at King’s College London (1987-1989) into improving metred dose inhalation through patient training in the physiology of the inhaled route. This won support from the Stimulating Progress fund of London’s North East Thames Regional Health Authority and Vitalograph Ltd (UK). Doctoral research (1995-2001) focused on patients’ indeterminate experiences of the tests used in HIV/AIDS, the ELISA, Western blot and PCR tests. Kevin has more than thirty years’ experience in gaining £150k+ in research funds for leading and participating as principal and co-instigator. He is a qualified nurse educator who has worked in university education, research and public health at Kingston/St.George’s University of London, University of York, Liverpool John Moores, Canterbury Christ Church University and Middlesex University. Kevin also has experience in acute clinical, forensic and community nursing with over one hundred research outputs in peer-reviewed, patient-reviewed and citizen science publications. Current research and consultancy is focused on human physiology, visual art and citizen participation in science and technology.

ACKNOWELDGEMENTS

KPC Research and Consultancy Limited gratefully acknowledge the valuable feedback received from all of the reviewers during preparation of the manuscript revision prior to publication. Monograph design by KPC Research and Consultancy Limited.

Kevin P. Corbett has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act, 1988, to be identified as the Author of this Work. All rights reserved.

© Kevin P. Corbett

ISBN 978-1-5272-6214-0

Designed and Printed in Great Britain

KPC Research and Consultancy Ltd

kpcresearch@btinternet.com

www.kevinpcorbett.com

Corrupt UK Law Courts Exposed!

The despicable persecution of  David Noakes and Lyn Thyer continues. Lyn has already been unlawfully extradited and has been incarcerated in a French jail under fabricated evidence.
Sociopathic judges are now after David whose only crime is to cure people of cancer with a completely natural remedy known as GcMAF.

 

More Evidence routinely suppressed!

                                                     The Truth About Cannabis 

PS.If you'd rather not take medicinal Hemp oil then Laetrile or Amygdala has the same effect!

This little known 'Vitamin' will destroy cancerous cells!

Just a gentle reminder that nobody needs to suffer from the effects of allopathic medicine!

Just go get yourself some Apricots!

A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB......PS. HAVE A HAPPY HEALTHY NEW YEAR!

For anyone looking for cures or just a healthier life, please watch this awesome presentation:

GcMAF Cures Cancer but is banned by MHRA!! Watch, listen and learn!

More evidence of Governmental suppression of legitimate cures:

Some cancer home truths from David Icke (& Noel Edmonds!)

My Music

THIS FRUIT KILLS MALIGNANT CELLS OF 12 DIFFERENT TYPES OF CANCER, MORE EFFECTIVE THAN CHEMO!

Graviola, Guyabano or Guanábana otherwise known as Soursop is a prickly, green tropical fruit that can weigh up to 15 pounds and grow about 12 inches long. Its flavor has been described as a mix between strawberry and pineapple, with a hint of sour citrus flavor. The leaves of Soursop fruit have amazing medicinal properties which makes them usable as an ingredient in several herbal health care products.

Soursop offers carbohydrates as its main nutrient and they are free of fat, cholesterol and sodium. This prickly fruit is an excellent source of calcium, copper, fiber, iron, magnesium, niacin, phosphorus, potassium, riboflavin, thiamin, and vitamins B1, B3 and C. The leaves are full of several vital compounds including calcium, fructose, fat, protein, vitamins A and B.

Soursop And Cancer

Soursop is said to have super nutrients that are more effective in killing cancerous cells than chemotherapy.

There have been studies that showed that those who took Soursop extract had better immune systems. The extract was shown to be helpful in targeting and killing cancer cells in about 12 types of cancer, including prostate, colon, pancreatic, breast, and lung cancer.

The compounds in the extract have been proven to help in slowing down the growth of malignant cells, even better than the strong and commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, Adriamycin.

When patients undergo chemotherapy, all the body systems suffer alongside the malignant cells. The Soursop extract’s compound will selectively track and kill only the cancerous cells, and leave the healthy cells alone. There have been studies conducted since 1976 that indicate soursop is indeed a very good killer of cancer cells.

The fatty acids called acetogenins, one in particular called annonacin, as well as other compounds called quinolones, annopentocins and two alkaloids, coreximine and reticuline are said to have the potential to prevent or slow the growth of cancer. A study published in the “Journal of Medicinal Chemistry,” in 1997 reported that compounds from Soursop were tested on breast cancer cells in culture and proved to be 250 times more effective in killing the cells than chemotherapy drugs. A laboratory study conducted at Catholic University of Korea determined that Soursop compounds target only the cancer cells for destruction and leaves healthy cells untouched.

The Many Health Benefits of Eating Soursop

It is rich with various nutrients and contain certain phytonutrients that are highly beneficial for strengthening the immune system, thus is useful for natural treatment of many ailments.

Anti-aging: Soursop is high in vitamin C and an excellent antioxidant to increase stamina and energy and it also slows down the aging process.

Blood disorders: The tree is rich in iron and teas made from Soursop fruit and leaves are excellent for treating anemia and increasing red blood cell count.

Bone health: The phosphorus and calcium present in Soursop is good for strong bones and to help prevent osteoporosis.

Heart and nerve health: The vitamin B1 in Soursop is able to accelerate metabolism, blood circulation, prevent nerve damage, and restore central nervous system disorders. The vitamin B2 is essential for the body’s energy production, fat storage and to maintain heart muscles.

Immune system: Soursop contains various super phytonutrients that are beneficial for building and strengthening the immune system.

Infections: Due to the antimicrobial properties in this super fruit, it helps clear up fungal infections, bacterial infections and intestinal parasites, that improves gut health and the immune system.

Skin conditions: Soursop leaves can be mashed up and applied on the affected areas twice a day regularly. This can help alleviate the pain caused by eczema and treat it. Soursop leaves mixed with rose water can be beneficial when applied to the skin to help blackheads and other skin conditions.

Sleep: Soursop is often used as a sedative in certain cultures. The leaves can be brewed to make a drink that helps promote sleep. Soursop leaves can be placed inside a pillowcase to enhance sleep quality.

Consumption: The pulp of the fruit can be made into fruit nectar, smoothies, fruit drinks, candies, sorbets, and ice cream flavoring.

Soursop leaves can be boiled for natural treatment of various inflammatory conditions like arthritis, gout, back pain, or simply to boost the immune system.  Boil 10 leaves in 3 cups of water until about one cup remains, strain and let it cool. Drink this brew every morning for about 3-4 weeks to determine progress in the condition.

Unripe Soursop should be stored at room temperature and placed in the refrigerator for up to two days after it has ripened.

One Patient’s Experience….No Chemo, No Radiation - CHIPSA Hospital: Gerson Therapy Center Cancer Treatment

http://chipsahospital.org/one-patients-experience-no-chemo-no-radation/

Have you heard of Dr Stanislaw Burzynski M.D, Ph.D?

.....Unlikely I guess, but if you are an individual whose life has been affected by the pharmaceutical industry's perpetual disinformation campaign with cancer, and you are seeking one of the many genuine cures, then please watch the following video.

  

Coconut Oil Kills 93% of Colon Cancer Cells in Only 2 Days

Coconut Oil Cures

Chemotherapy is a Waste of Money, fraudulent and kills people! Truth!

Magnetic!

We're all magnetic, vibrational beings....

Just noticed this interesting article on a new benign treatment for eliminating cancerous cells - Magnetism!

Yes, the remedy works on the same principle as Amygdalin (Vit B17) or Trypsin, which poisons the malignant cells without damaging the healthy ones.
Click the link below for more details....

Korean scientists successfully kill cancer with magnets!

Help To Cure The World!

We can now all be a part of the growing worldwide liberation movement created by Michael Tellinger and his UBUNTU Party!

If you are fed up with the same old broken promises, reduced benefits and standards of living, hiked prices and increased taxes, all enforced by the same old useless political parties, which we faithfully elect to represent us - the people, then it's time to make a proper New Year's Resolution and vote for UBUNTU on 07/05/2015!

if you would like to be a part of this peaceful revolution and make your own unique personal contribution, please click below for more details:

http://www.ubuntuparty.org.za

UBUNTU Party UK - MANIFESTO UK Elections 7th May 2015

Vote UBUNTU!

In order to begin the worldwide cure for our society, environment and every enslaved human being on earth, please click the link below and discover the only credible liberation organisation ....

Vote for Ubuntu Party UK on 07/05/2015

Top 6 Alkaline Foods To Eat Daily For Vibrant Health

By Alanna Ketler

Unfortunately the typical American diet consists largely of toxic and acid-forming foods like refined grains, processed sugars, artificial sweeteners, pasteurized juices, fried foods, meat and dairy – the list goes on. Combine all of this food with a lack of sleep, stress and pharmaceutical drugs to top it all off and it’s no wonder why people are being diagnosed with various diseases at an alarming rate.

It is important to maintain a proper pH balance. All foods in nature contain both acid and alkaline-forming elements and according to the Conscious Living Center, balance can be either achieved or prevented as a direct result from the food that we are eating. When we eat too many acidic foods it can lead to major health complications, such as “acidosis” this is a common diagnosis in people with diabetes. When nutrients required to maintain this slightly alkaline state cannot be obtained from the foods that we are eating, the body will then draw from its own stores, from the bones or other vital tissues, this damages the body’s ability to repair itself and detoxify heavy metals.

Again, the ultimate goal is balance. Although it is important to maintain this slightly alkaline state, eating too many or primarily alkaline foods only can have its own set of complications; although the risk of this happening is a lot less likely than the risk of the body becoming too acidic. 

Here are the top 6 alkaline foods to incorporate into your diet daily.

1. Lemons!

Most people assume that lemons are an acidic fruit, maybe it is because of the sour taste, or the citric acid, but in actuality lemons are very alkaline. Lemons have a pH level of 9.0, they actually produce an alkaline ash after digestion. Lemons are also rich in vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and electrolytes. They couldn’t be easier to add to your daily intake, try squeezing a lemon into your water throughout the day or spritzing the juice over your salad at lunch.

2. Apples

Apples have a pH level of 8.0 and contain a variety of minerals, vitamins and phytochemicals, which help to keep the body and immune system working optimally. Apples also contain enzymes, which assist in maintaining the body’s natural hormonal balance. I think you know how to eat an apple, but if you don’t they can be eaten raw, or even in a pie or a crumble!

3. Root Vegetables

Root vegetables have an extremely high mineral content; you actually can’t get enough of them. Beets, carrots, turnips, parsnips, there are many different root vegetables. You can steam them, roast them, or even eat them raw, grated in salads.

4. Alfalfa Sprouts

Sprouts are amazing little nutrient-packed powerhouses that are highly alkaline and contain a lot of essential vitamins and minerals. The best thing about sprouts is that you can easily and economically sprout your own seeds and have them on hand all throughout the year. Click for more information and how to grow your own sprouts HERE.

5. Leafy Greens

Leafy greens include vegetables such as kale, Swiss chard, collard greens and spinach, which is probably the best pick. Spinach has an extremely high content of vitamin K and folate, and other vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, antioxidants and fibre. You can easily add spinach to your morning smoothie, or in a soup or stew, or just as is in a salad. You can even lightly steam it with two other alkaline foods: garlic and lemon.

6. Watermelon

Not only is watermelon a high alkalising food, with a pH of 9.0 it is extremely tasty as well. It is also an excellent source of fibre, beta-carotene, vitamin C and lycopene. Watermelon consists of 92% water, and is extremely thirst quenching. It also has a variety of other amazing health benefits click HERE to read more.

Wheatgrass...

....is another indispensable, totally nutritious food which will greatly assist in maintaining a healthy body PH, and also help to cure all known diseases!

Check out the clip below for more info:

Click on the following image for another great article - including the added bonus for anyone (like me!) with salt n' pepper hair colour! ;)